Web Annotation Data Model and Vocabulary are W3C Candidate Recommendations
November 22nd, 2016
The Web Annotation Working Group has published a Candidate Recommendation for two documents:
This is a re-publication, without substantial change, of the Candidate Recommendation published on the 6th of September. The only significant change (beyond minor editorial clarifications and editorial changes) is that some features that are not expected to receive enough implementations to fulfill the exit criteria, have been moved into an informative appendix. No new features have been added and no normative features have been changed.
Candidate Recommendation means that the Working Group considers the technical design to be complete, and is seeking implementation feedbacks on the documents. There is a separate document how to use them and report on implementation results. The group is keen to get comments and implementation experiences on these specifications, either as issues on the Group’s GitHub repository or by posting to firstname.lastname@example.org.
The group expects to satisfy the implementation goals (i.e., at least two, independent implementation for each of the test cases) by December 30, 2016.
- Web Annotation Data Model: This specification describes a structured model and format, in JSON, to enable annotations to be shared and reused across different hardware and software platforms. Common use cases can be modeled in a manner that is simple and convenient, while at the same time enabling more complex requirements, including linking arbitrary content to a particular data point or to segments of timed multimedia resources.
- Web Annotation Vocabulary: This specifies the set of RDF classes, predicates and named entities that are used by the Web Annotation Data Model. It also lists recommended terms from other ontologies that are used in the model, and provides the JSON-LD Context and profile definitions needed to use the Web Annotation JSON serialization in a Linked Data context.